difference between z

Difference between MVVM and MVP

Difference between MVVM and MVP

There are many different ways to design and architect an application. Two of the more popular approaches are MVVM and MVP. But what is the difference between them? And which one is right for your project? In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at both MVVM and MVP, and compare and contrast them. We’ll also explore when each one might be the best option. Read on to learn more!

What is MVVM?

  • MVVM is a software architectural pattern that separates an application into three different components: the model, the view, and the view model.
  • The model represents the data of the application, the view represents how that data is presented to the user, and the view model manages the interactions between the model and the view.
  • MVVM is often used in conjunction with other software patterns such as MVVC and MVC. MVVM was first introduced by Microsoft in 2005, but it has since been adopted by many other developers. While MVVM is not a perfect solution for every problem, it can be a helpful tool for creating more modular and testable code.

What is MVP?

MVP is a software design pattern that separates the application into three components: the model, the view, and the presenter. MVP is typically used in conjunction with a user interface framework such as MVC or MVVM. The MVP pattern originated from the Smalltalk community, where it was known as “Triads”.

  • MVP was later popularized by Martin Fowler and Kent Beck. The MVP pattern is similar to the MVC pattern, but with one key difference: in MVP, the presenter component handles all of the application’s business logic, while in MVC the controller component handles much of the business logic. This separation of concerns makes MVP a more testable and flexible pattern than MVC.
  • MVP is also well-suited for use with passive view frameworks such as React. In passive view frameworks, UI components are typically not aware of the application’s business logic.
  • As a result, all of the business logic must be handled by a presenter component. MVP is also sometimes referred to as “Model 2″, ” Presentation-Abstraction-Control (PAC)”, or “Supervising Controller”.

Despite its many advantages, MVP has some drawbacks. One potential drawback is that MVP can lead to code duplication if not used correctly. For example, if two views need to display the same data, then that data must be duplicated in both views’ presenter components. MVP can also be more complex than MVC or other software patterns, which can make it more difficult to understand and maintain. Despite these drawbacks, MVP is a widely used software pattern that can be very beneficial in certain situations.

Difference between MVVM and MVP

MVVM and MVP are two common design patterns used in software development. MVVM (Model View ViewModel) is a powerful pattern that helps to separate the concerns of the application, making it easier to maintain and test. MVP (Model View Presenter) is a lighter-weight pattern that is often used in cases where MVVM would be overkill. Both MVVM and MVP can be used to create effective applications, but it’s important to choose the right pattern for the job.


In conclusion, MVVM is a more sophisticated and complex pattern than MVP. It has the potential to lead to better quality code, but it also requires more time and effort to set up. If you are starting a new project and have the resources available, MVVM may be the right choice for you. However, if you are working on a tight timeline or with limited resources, MVP may be a better option.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email