difference between z

Difference between Coercion and Undue Influence

Difference between Coercion and Undue Influence

In any situation where someone is making a decision that could have a significant impact on their life, it’s important to be aware of the difference between coercion and undue influence. Coercion is the use of force or threats to get someone to do something, while undue influence is exerted when someone uses their position of authority or power over another person in order to persuade them to make a decision they wouldn’t otherwise make. Undue influence can be very difficult to identify, but it’s important to be aware of its potential effects so that you can make informed decisions about your life and your future.

What is Coercion?

  • Coercion is the act of using force or threats to compel someone to do something against their will. Coercion can take many forms, from physical force to emotional manipulation. It is often used to gain compliance from someone who is unwilling or reluctant to cooperate. In some cases, coercion may be considered a form of violence.
  • In others, it may be seen as a legitimate means of persuasion. Whether coercion is considered acceptable or not often depends on the specific situation and the degree to which the person being coerced isresistant.
  • Coercion can be an effective way to achieve a desired outcome, but it can also have a negative impact on the relationship between people. Coercion should only be used when it is absolutely necessary, and even then, it should be done with care.

What is Undue Influence?

  • Undue influence is the unlawful or improper pressure of one person upon another causing the influenced person to do something against their free will or better judgment. Undue influence is often exerted by people in positions of authority over others, such as parents, teachers, coaches, employers, or clergy members.
  • It can also be exerted by anyone who has a close relationship with the victim, such as a friend, romantic partner, or family member. Undue influence can be psychological or emotional in nature, or it can be physical force.
  • In order to be considered undue, the pressure must be excessive and have caused the victim to act against their own interests. If the victim was coerced into doing something that they would not have normally done without the influence, then it may be considered undue.

Difference between Coercion and Undue Influence

Coercion and undue influence are two terms that are often used interchangeably. However, there is a key distinction between the two concepts. Coercion refers to the act of using force or threats in order to get someone to do something against their will. Undue influence, on the other hand, occurs when one person takes advantage of another person’s vulnerable state in order to convince them to do something they wouldn’t normally do. While both coercion and undue influence can be used to obtain compliance from another person, only undue influence is considered true manipulation. As such, it is generally considered to be a more serious form of coercion.


Coercion is a strong-arm tactic that forces someone to do something they don’t want to do. Undue influence, on the other hand, is a more subtle form of persuasion that can convince someone to do something they may not have otherwise agreed to. It’s important for marketers and business owners to understand the difference between these two tactics, as coercion can lead to negative outcomes for both the customer and the company, while undue influence can often result in positive outcomes for all involved.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email